中國為什么是危機中的贏家

鐵哥無敵

中國為什么是危機中的贏家DAVOS SPECIAL: CRISIS WINNERS
Why China Works

Published Jan 10, 2009


China is the only major economy that is likely to show significant growth this year, because it is the only one that routinely breaks every rule in the economic textbook. There is no truly free market in China, where the state doctors statistics, manipulates the stock markets, fixes prices in key industries, owns many strategic industries outright, and staffs key bank posts with Communist Party members and tells them to whom they should lend, and in what they should invest. In fact, the main reason China is not slowing as fast as the other big five economies is its capacity for what economists ridicule, in normal times, as state meddling: it limited foreign investment in the banking sector and didn't embrace the exotic financial innovations that are the melting core of the global credit crisis.

Why does China's brand of command capitalism work? The question has long intrigued economists, who tend to cast the state as hopelessly stupid, the market as naturally brilliant. Now that the United States and Europe are moving toward state control—by nationalizing the banking and car industries, and imposing heavy new regulation on the financial industry—the question has a new urgency. China, the poorest and most chaotic big economy, looks like the one best positioned to navigate what may be the worst global downturn in seven decades.

In a time of crisis, China's bureaucrats can pick from traditional market tools, like their Western counterparts, and from the arsenal of command capitalism. Early last year, as the housing market was overheating, they simply ordered bankers to cut back on housing loans: then as home sales began to fall, they offered market incentives, like lower taxes on home purchases. In recent weeks they launched economic rescue efforts similar to those in the west, including a huge ($600 billion) plan to ramp up government spending and big interest-rate cuts. But they've also issued orders that would be seen as improper "intervention" in the West—for example, calling last week on state industries, including steel and construction, to "actively increase" their roles in the economy by buying up new assets at home and abroad.

超人回來

忽悠,？ 譏諷,？

海山

哈哈,，莫非是某內參里的,？

mwpmwp717

有的學者稱
經濟危機中 美國就像是一個研究生做錯了一道題
而中國是初中生
沒有可比性 的

鵬程萬里

如果說中國能成為這次危機中的贏家，那也只能代表著中國市場經濟的不成熟或者說中國還不是一個真正市場經濟,，是個半成品

tingting8763

中國會是危機中的贏家么,？？,？,？？,？太可笑了

LJF青峰

太可笑了�,。�,！
著設漫卷全球的金融危機,，沒有任何硝煙，但無數(shù)經濟實體紛紛落地有聲,！
現(xiàn)在沒有任何人敢說度過了金融危機,，更沒有人敢說大賺特賺掙了多少個億。
有沒有看到中國也在發(fā)放消費卷,，最直接最快速地刺激消費,？,？？
還生怕比別的國家發(fā)放的少呢,。
個人認為現(xiàn)在各大國都是在拼命硬撐著,，看誰的資金厚誰的家底厚，誰能撐得
久才能挨得這一關,。任何一個大國都在想盡一切辦法,，讓本國的經濟進入良性循環(huán)，擺脫外境惡劣環(huán)境的影響,。

耶穌愛子

沒有贏家,，可能我們輸?shù)纳冱c

三十開始學機械

感覺中國的部分人手里有一些不光明的錢，趁現(xiàn)在國家在促消費的時候拿出來用掉,，這是沒有持續(xù)性的消費,，中國民不富啊

迪斯

不到最后誰也不能判定誰贏誰負，