|
14#
![](static/image/common/ico_lz.png)
樓主 |
發(fā)表于 2009-3-17 23:04:39
|
只看該作者
This guy basically has no experience, and you guys are completely training him over the internet for free, and somewhat awkwardly I might add.
8 ^3 m: b. C/ ^# v) J* s/ G ~+ a3 {8 w7 S' y: Y! Z, a
He started out with all kinds of monumentally stupid ideas about calibrating his machine himself, now we can easily see that he can't even properly operate a
L( ]$ L$ l% j' e( n) v. C1 w+ l. y6 m8 s$ j( V- I
cmm talk about programming one.
1 @0 E* a, g, G( I* W1 }8 w: S& D$ l
I've sat buy and read a dozen threads started by him asking about ridiculously basic cmm concepts.
! m2 y6 [1 {7 M9 m
; Q' n- J; |" N; L! s) o" u! @' fMaybe I would be more receptive if he came in here from the start and said "hey guys, I know absolutely zero about cmm's, but I want to be just like $ z5 r$ H3 c% E( m) s& \. a
3 f! t0 o+ ]0 fyou...can you help me? Where do I start?" But instead I find myself continually astounded by the questions he is asking. It is so compelling to read just so
" |- @3 w1 V( p; t1 i
' [2 e6 s. Z4 T, s, @: b4 \+ athat I understand it fully when I get to the inevitable end of this story involving a major rejection and impending bankruptcy of some poor company he works ' k6 h1 K% p2 s
) v* _$ T! G0 @2 E! `+ {6 l% `
for.
8 S! T U: q, D/ R' T9 P, D+ h/ f& t$ z
The only possible outcome I can see is the company he works for ending up in financial ruins as he "programs" a part and their setup adjusts the parts so
7 Z% Y' P& y1 o& o4 g- ]! I$ e5 n
1 `' ~, c/ m h3 Nthat they "look good" on the cmm reports and they ship parts to customers, ultimately destined for rejection or worse failure during operation. I honestly
: C4 n, P; Q& `) h& _. |, t( {) j- A" L
pray when I read his posts that he doesn't make something like steering or braking components, seat belt retractors.....the list goes on and on. : Q4 w9 i& j/ v: e
; _7 i3 o4 h; a2 g: x! k `$ u
這一個(gè)人基本上沒有經(jīng)驗(yàn),,而你們正在免費(fèi)通過互聯(lián)網(wǎng)完整培訓(xùn)他,,我可能稍微增加點(diǎn)難度。 : K" p& F- F- [7 l- B
- v1 g6 c3 J$ U- n& u9 O/ Y' Z他從自己校正他的機(jī)器的各種非常愚蠢的主意開始,,現(xiàn)在我們?nèi)菀卓闯鏊粋(gè)甚至不能正確操作cmm的人,。
- s& g; I, C- _. e0 h b0 f; D/ a) q* L
我做出犧牲,閱讀一堆章節(jié)并被他開始問各種荒謬最基本的cmm 觀念。) N' y* x, `3 T# t: e$ X9 _
/ O3 [( w, U0 c0 q- l( z: O. O! ]5 K可能我應(yīng)該更加接納他剛進(jìn)來就說:我基本對cmm了解為零,但是我成為你那樣...你能幫助我嗎?我從那里開始?但是我發(fā)現(xiàn)自己不停的被問的吃驚.我完全理解,當(dāng)我得到這個(gè)故事必
( ]0 B5 I$ \" `% k2 A5 W% p
- F7 d& ^/ M, W0 j$ a L, |& d然的包括他工作的公司必然是非常容易被淘汰和即將發(fā)生倒閉
" c/ f# S: p& r7 I) \4 |7 X
1 @* [3 }7 D+ }! J! p我看他服務(wù)的公司最后的結(jié)果是財(cái)務(wù)破產(chǎn)作為他'程序'的一部分他們計(jì)劃調(diào)整這部分以便他們在cmm報(bào)告中看起來好點(diǎn).他們把這個(gè)給客戶.最多被拒絕或者在使用中完全失敗.當(dāng)我
- c; f: `$ Q; s$ t$ s
/ X& c8 u2 u3 l! [* x! d: I讀他那職位的時(shí)候,我真誠的起到他不是做方向盤或者轉(zhuǎn)向制動(dòng)器,安全帶....這個(gè)列表繼續(xù)% j B6 H ~; M& {. |; p
/ J9 o- P* B& S* F9 t
6 c$ p! T( e9 A4 [1 `
* a' E* g9 V, B& j5 [I (like many of you) am a professional fault-finder by trade.
+ \( f6 b# W$ K: D: K4 Y+ J2 J* Z' f, s$ W7 [9 b
Let's see if I can find any errors or problems with anything that Section has stated in his last post.$ J3 J; u# r+ T% o, A; b
& p& @3 E3 n/ Y" V0 S% [9 @0 \& ~: a) R1 o, G3 ?8 T& E
Nope, can't find a single thing in error. I'd say that he's hit the nail squarely on the head.+ y2 \; ]! j1 f6 z9 C3 E
3 \4 \6 V$ F0 H+ \In fact, I've wondered several times in the past if this guy was really an experienced CMM geek who's just messin' with our heads, but I'm convinced that ( x' `" `- ~: k, _; I& l2 ]* q" @% l
6 B* Q K; O/ n9 Z0 g
he's on the level, which is quite disturbing. His situation could be used as an excellent case study about why CMM geeks should ALL be certified - JUST LIKE
, `# E: u$ J% G8 Z$ q- w
. j( V7 b6 F0 z3 D0 |: K/ ATHE MACHINES HAVE TO BE!!!!
/ k2 U- H5 P. |" s$ [, b( ~6 } @" H ^5 ~
Analogy time: Why shouldn't it be good enough if a VEHICLE is inspected, registered and licensed? Why should the OPERATOR have be trained and licensed? The
' P" N4 K8 G3 m- u3 L
3 R$ G- _; x! Y% y7 p8 @; K! `7 J; Hcar's just fine, and that's the thing that does all the work! The operator just goes along for the ride, right? What could possibly go wrong?4 b3 h& v3 I' `2 |& q S: @
我(象你們中很多人一樣)是一個(gè)經(jīng)過專門培訓(xùn)對質(zhì)量吹毛求疵的專業(yè)人士,。 ; M2 F6 L2 ^ W+ Z5 Z# \# c* a/ R
如果我能找任何的錯(cuò)誤或的問題任何事,,讓我們見到那一個(gè)區(qū)段已經(jīng)在他的最后職位中陳述。
6 ?: `$ l! }" B" ?" s- D9 E" g不,,不能在錯(cuò)誤中找一些線索,。 我將會(huì)說,他腦子壞掉了,。
6 ^) \$ o- {$ z" w* m6 e0 U" |
; @( S" m& o$ L3 k& M+ h事實(shí)上,我在過去懷疑過很長時(shí)間這個(gè)家伙是不是真的是一個(gè)有經(jīng)驗(yàn)的cmm怪人,他僅僅是打亂我們的思路,但是我確認(rèn)他是一個(gè)卓越的人.這是不用討論的,他的情況應(yīng)該被當(dāng)作一個(gè)
) k! `! A5 G, Z* e4 L! a) b, B/ v" m& L
優(yōu)秀的學(xué)習(xí)案例:為什么鑒定為cmm怪人,就想機(jī)器一樣
! Y E- w& b8 x3 ]4 \# Y6 W) f" A/ D' X4 i& |
類似:如果一輛車輛已經(jīng)被檢查,,登記以及許可,它為什么不是最佳狀態(tài),? 為什么那操作員應(yīng)該被訓(xùn)練而且得到許可的,? 小車還好,所有的工作都一樣,! 操作員僅僅是湊湊熱鬧0 B# N7 F6 ?. U3 j* M5 B. C
' W& ]1 W7 a( t* Y& b2 p0 ]
,,對不對? 怎么會(huì)出錯(cuò),?
) s# l! S9 H+ t5 b& y8 }
4 ?( K5 b; ^0 Y. B+ M: @ ^- i# p' [) T" ?# [9 ~' m B5 n
4 A( i/ W: t: k
4 s$ g* E- [- D* q+ J
hi,
) R+ [! o5 c, I# f. I2 T3 ai think you guys are fedup from me.i am really sorry for that.But appreciate the co-operation of you people. & s" e; O3 i' i
GoldenPine5 [6 S; r/ x9 P, B" v7 c
. U- }# F% h8 p* T+ C
嗨,,
, W% \7 `- s! M9 j/ w9 q我認(rèn)為,你們是從我這郁悶.我真的抱歉,。但是還是感激幫助者,。
) Y, [/ z- @' e2 B1 @" g T" s2 n: k1 ?* t9 V9 `
my machine is measuring a standard ring gage 3 microns less.is there any option in the metrolog to compensate it manually or i have to add up in the results
8 q5 ^# F: }: `, [
% }+ ~" r1 C" w2 p, }, J7 Eat the end? , D* |, \0 f$ @0 L$ w' L/ H; u8 L' M
我的機(jī)器測量一個(gè)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)環(huán)規(guī)小了3微米.是不是有選項(xiàng)去手動(dòng)補(bǔ)償或我不得不在最后把它加入到結(jié)果,?
4 n: j8 b9 L* i' D% f( e, c; F/ [% k2 p, o# L) D
1 }: o. u$ I. n* a! M: f/ v0 gIs that 3um less than nominal, or 3um less than the calibrated result for the gauge ?. u6 D1 E: g* _( q7 j
3微米是不是小于名義值,或3微米小于環(huán)規(guī)的校準(zhǔn)結(jié)果,?) ]4 N& g) ~7 i. |6 P6 m2 F! O4 s. d
8 R) r" h D8 y1 J c) c
, e0 M; a- q( ?# P, dits the nominal.As its has been engrved on the standard for example 10 mm (+9 microns).cmm is reading it as 10.06 mm.
, t6 |) }( x+ Z$ N7 @, U/ N正常,。如果已經(jīng)被標(biāo)定例如10mm(+9mm)。那么cmm 讀數(shù)為10.06mm,。 & Z4 _' i; A1 O
- }; A0 Z6 b8 |- U% ~7 h. a9 h
, H- S1 ^5 w. m6 H! c% T10.06 is plus sixty microns. Six microns is .006.
! U( _6 k7 |' Y* N
8 k. x! r) M# f7 m; _( uPerhaps you meant 10.006?. g8 t' A9 u5 [. I, N" W
0 R5 A9 M1 ~( i
Is your cmm nc or manual? If it's manual, my advice would be to give up and buy a real cmm. If it's nc then make sure you have a program to calibrate the * \# L, W& _9 E: h
7 t& w2 X$ {- r/ i0 [: o, estylus. Make sure the measurements on the masterball are taken properly. Make sure the points are properly spaced and contacting the masterball at the
- Y* H7 Y; y( S# D$ }2 f/ x% D3 G( ~, S6 ^! L
optimal "attack angle".
( W# q: D% o: O# r
9 `. y- y( b; y3 vOnce you have a program for probe calibration then you should do some testing. Calibrate the stylus and inspect the ring gage several times. Re-position the 2 @& a# _% p$ E2 Z
- }) H0 f$ e" ]& J$ \3 Z- nring gage between runs. You may want to re-clean it between runs but be careful not to affect the temperature. Then, repeat this whole process several times
6 ~( H% {: o- d# E; E5 w3 ^; E1 s/ ]( p2 z1 v
(including re-calibrating the stylus). If the variance you see here is more than .003mm (i expect it will be), then the 3 microns you are seeing is noise. If ( c/ _1 p% s$ |7 O: T2 z
" z' X5 f: M( u( y3 G
it's more than .03mm then there's probably something wrong. ( z7 d5 g, M% D6 L8 r9 {
6 N0 Q1 ~# B, d% O# p. |
If it's somewhere in between and you need better, if possible, try a shorter stylus. ' N+ f6 p1 q6 z9 |+ U, D( }" Q4 H
( U+ e' V3 a8 K; h) K
10.06是60個(gè)微米,。六個(gè)微米是.006 。
+ A- ?# _- [& z9 i3 s9 {3 d* E/ t, D' E7 A. ?: w- W* r( c
可能你認(rèn)為是10.006?
% i7 N7 c2 E1 h* \0 v6 b你的cmm是自動(dòng)還是手動(dòng),? 如果它是手動(dòng),,我的建議是放棄它同時(shí)再買臺(tái)真正的cmm 。如果它是自動(dòng), 那么確信你有建議一個(gè)探針校正程序,。 確定在標(biāo)準(zhǔn)球上的測量正確的,。 確: ]' Z" L/ n( [/ f" n3 D
7 I3 {$ h: M6 S( }* N# E
定點(diǎn)是以正確的位置和最佳的法線角度去接觸標(biāo)準(zhǔn)球.( R% |3 G: m( |, r6 Z8 C
% T; f2 @: {+ U2 X/ b
一旦你有一個(gè)校準(zhǔn)測頭的程序,你應(yīng)該做一些測試.校準(zhǔn)探針和檢查環(huán)規(guī)多次。測量中重新調(diào)整環(huán)規(guī)位置,。在測量中你可能想重復(fù)調(diào)整它但是小心不要影響它的溫度& o% B# X8 u0 e6 z
X( m1 I3 Z9 Y @! q9 W. L( J2 [& P然后,,重復(fù)這整個(gè)程序多次(包括重復(fù)校準(zhǔn)探針) 如果在這里你見到的差異超過.003mm(我預(yù)計(jì)它會(huì)), 那么你看到的這3個(gè)微米是噪音。如果它是超過.03mm, 那么那些地方可能$ e% x. Y# f D4 b6 t- ^
F! b& L7 S, f* c& K
有錯(cuò)誤,。 , J& F3 \! B8 L1 R. M6 t# K
9 z3 P2 a/ ~1 M4 l' M3 |
如果它處于中間,,同時(shí)你想更要的效果.如果可能的,試一個(gè)較短的測針,。
; f% f. W# D7 T/ ?
9 S" X3 u/ q$ S! i* b8 [/ t' }# ^. Z' N/ X- z3 d
Agreed Ken,
# u9 A! N5 f w5 Y$ lThe biggest ball dia with the shortest shank length is always the way to go. A TP200 instead of a TP2 or 20 would reduce the lobing effect also, but I
" U6 P# v; Z6 W9 ]: t7 W! q7 Y% D! o* q/ Q9 i. ~+ c+ r
realise the choice is not always there. 5 Q% H6 P4 P; p, S
* H( g4 R9 q. g: W9 {7 MI always set my alignment plane through the centerline of the ring ( cylinder measurement ) as , although these gauges are usually square from the cylinder " N1 B* z8 F% I; {7 ]6 H. a" p
4 S) B' Z. n1 S6 L/ d1 c# C5 D# Kto the outer surfaces, you just never know for sure.
3 Q9 e/ z* R3 ^2 y- G: m) L3 F4 h. o
The other matters to add up are, 4 S6 t/ l7 _$ @& g0 k$ P
the uncertainty of measurement of the machine : ! j2 L0 H9 ]# l% K$ K/ D- p
the actual calibration result for the ring gauge ( not the engraved size ):
* m( f: |2 K' U& s+ A$ Q- ]- wthe algorithm used for the dia result :5 J a: A0 J( k4 C4 h$ J
room conditions ( temp humidity cleanliness ) :6 B7 `* U3 L# ?9 @3 r/ N
2 B4 w3 |$ s1 R. M* f% }; I0 E" j" `& r8 |* T9 L
Good luck G.P. in finding your 3 microns. They're in there somewhere.
' g( Q! \2 w6 ^* v" k# ?% o' \( {同意肯恩,,$ \/ K1 }- I2 t# l- y0 k; k3 ?
這個(gè)方法最好是用最大的球莖和最短的探針長度。用TP200代替TP2或tp20會(huì)也減小效果,,但是我認(rèn)為問題并不在那里,。
" t9 `6 S# h! N2 `( G- V5 i, k2 }$ }# n ]1 @, a& K+ m0 ~: g
我總是通過環(huán)規(guī)的中心設(shè)置我的基準(zhǔn)面(測量圓柱),雖然這些環(huán)規(guī)從圓柱到外圓面是非常一致的,單你僅僅是不確 / D. o3 j6 P, X6 r3 I2 O' s0 ~7 T
$ g& l* `: d' i* B) G3 D8 _, ]8 d
其他因素加起來是,
5 g, h+ k* ]# b- _, I, M機(jī)器的測量的不確定:
7 P- n3 j5 {7 R/ a環(huán)規(guī)實(shí)際的校準(zhǔn)結(jié)果(不是被標(biāo)的值): - ?( \3 l* B# j k4 _6 p
結(jié)果圓的運(yùn)算法則:
' s( r, G$ m( b! U房間環(huán)境(臨時(shí)濕度) :
! l0 _5 L" O: | J# @! J
4 J# ]5 {; ~- {6 \& k
) p0 Y' F; `& P( ?G.P找到的3微米誤差就在里面,祝你幸運(yùn)!
# E3 ^7 A! E: z# O( d: _7 @3 M/ Z4 q3 r% v# g" y
$ x% }" q. D5 A2 A) p9 A0 c% Z% L( r# K* o4 i7 _- U+ V
$ ~3 v1 {1 z0 G2 Z) ^3 M/ kIs it necessary to align a ring gage beofre the dia measurement.I have read somewhere that we dun need to make alignment for dia measurements.is it right?
3 {7 a! _( h' N8 b. l+ H6 t: }3 f) [9 F$ \& ~: p l- t+ L7 M
在直徑測量之前有必要定位環(huán)規(guī),。我已經(jīng)某處讀我們需要制造 對準(zhǔn)直徑測量.是嗎,?
! Z- K: k' L$ B& r" ]. W: L( Y1 m
$ { G6 @* R7 O6 ~$ Y! N3 `; M8 }; ~3 n9 P
: S B' f6 k; q5 P5 Z' q$ `! i1 x; Q P- i, I
It's only my opinion G.P. , but if your trying to find your 3 microns, ! ?9 Q' l9 c8 n: d
9 B! S, v( Z9 I. B6 ^; I
then use all means at your disposal to measure each point perpendicular to the surface. & S* g d' r4 ^3 z6 U0 H
# p" _/ P' {% f3 S7 DThat includes aligning the ring gauge before measuring for dia.
; C% j( d: a* N6 {9 f0 X& P+ ?6 i) N8 n; ]/ A; J1 H$ d: K* _1 |
As a matter of interest, what size does the calibration certificate say the ring gauge is ?
' c1 z+ V/ v; N7 M- k它只是我個(gè)人的意見 G.P. ,,如果你想嘗試達(dá)到3個(gè)微米,, , z* Y5 c# K: x; f- l
' ~ I$ G$ J( o9 d+ G8 \7 q使用所有的方法(盡力而為),在測量任意一個(gè)點(diǎn)都要垂直于表面。
! R# ]. q$ k B/ c2 Z" }) G8 a& q. |
那包括在測量直徑之前排校準(zhǔn)環(huán)規(guī),。
C6 D- A. x% U* l; O0 l4 \& R$ Q& D$ Z& H
稍微有點(diǎn)好奇,,環(huán)規(guī)校準(zhǔn)報(bào)告說環(huán)規(guī)尺寸是所少,?
' Y5 M9 h$ V3 y7 X; J5 W; D7 N! w6 d- O# t
" W8 E9 x2 W1 w7 l# E
I would measure it as a cylinder. Set my coordinate to that cyl. & measure circles incrementally in the ring gage. + h& [* t; v6 W; z3 u
$ o, i. y/ U9 X$ h我會(huì)把它作為一個(gè)圓柱來測量。設(shè)定我的坐標(biāo)系為圓柱坐標(biāo)系同時(shí)在環(huán)規(guī)中逐漸提高測量圓
0 }. H" ?2 W) h# H$ s
6 [$ H% l0 G) }
) m, V6 t, ~# H0 I) M: K8 S& XYou are chasing 3um error in a diameter measurement?!, Y ^ {8 J& v9 j9 s
0 C4 B! q0 M0 V0 A8 B. b$ |
What type of machine? Manual or CNC
9 s- G6 w: u9 e) X- Y3 ^/ rWhat type of touch probe? TP20, TP2, SP25, TP200/ @$ g% Y# B$ z* M3 v
What length is the stylus? 10mm 20mm 100mm
3 A5 M! x/ S, u: H7 SWhat is the temperature in the room?
8 n! L+ K/ Q) d6 [What diameter is the ring gauge?9 v; D/ ~" ~( m7 V$ J# l
# ~7 }; S3 H- |) V. D# q2 C
Let's face it... 3um (0.003) is not a significant error, if you have 1 person standing near the machine breathing really heavy and the next day there are 5 1 v1 }5 y& Z9 _1 |; t
2 c. z. l( Q. n; Z3 [0 w
people breathing heavy it can effect your measurement.
$ I8 ~' R) W$ ^' D' G" a5 Q- U% c( w
$ k- v' r* [8 x: w7 l, E
你試圖測量一個(gè)直徑只有3微米的偏差,?,!
2 _: y& x- o& x9 s0 F& H$ w% V( _4 l2 b; I1 M
哪類機(jī)器,?手動(dòng)或自動(dòng)$ E+ H2 e5 ^. D8 c$ ?$ V
哪類探頭?TP20,TP2,SP25, TP200. R$ `9 ~8 G: i- }7 A3 d
探針長度為多少,? 20 毫米 10 毫米 100 毫米
) ]7 T% M3 H F5 j* L9 v房間中,,溫度多少? f% G# i% P/ i- s3 D
環(huán)規(guī)直徑為多少,?/ I- Z) A# r7 n5 d7 O
F+ ]0 n5 M7 W
讓我們正視它,。3 um(0.003) 并不重要,如果機(jī)器的附近站立的1個(gè)人呼吸 真和明天5個(gè)人呼吸都能影響你的測量,。 |
|